(Taken from BEHOLD THE MAN)
by
Archimandrite Chrystophoros
Kalybas
The
hypocrite is that simple-minded cunning type [of person] who pretends to cover
his, according to the rule, pitiful dispositions with gestures, contortions,
movements, words and actions.
The
hypocrite always and surely has targeted his victim. The deeper motives are
low, cheap, earthy. His aim is perfect[ly formed] or complete[d] in his ruined
soul, but for his victim or victims it is [still unclear], dark. His victim can
be an individual or individuals, a man or woman, religious or a-religious. For
the hypocrite it makes no difference what state, condition, gender, attribute,
religion, morality, or social strata. The dominating element in the miserable
soul of the hypocrite is the aim, which includes some reward, bodily or
spiritual. Hypocrisy is the means by which the selfish or pleasure-loving aim
is achieved. The hypocrite is egocentric, an individualist, severely the type
that gathers unto himself others belongings, deeply envious and jealous.
As a personality he isn’t worth it.
He
possesses the secret of a “clever woman”, one can say, flexibility and adapts
with amazing ease to every unpleasant manifestation in his circle, and he
succeeds amidst imperfect people to justify his existence as he is, his
movements as they are done, his works the meaning of which he does not believe
in. Thus his psychical synthesis or composition of soul is not externalized.
This, though it is an admixture of selfishness, envy and every dark urge,
appears with an external cloak of deception. Though he is impudent, he wears
the garment of guilessness. Though he lies, he uses manners of truth. Though he
is most selfish, he shows concern for common matters. Though he is undevout, he
appears as being concerned over altars and homes. Most formal in the traditions
is he who cheapens every idea of historic value, and most historical is the
sacrilegious one for the historical name he bears. From the simple merchant to
the greatest diplomat, and from the most unhewn villager to the wisest of
scientists, the hypocrite is discerned as a type that divides his personality
not psychologically but socially. Internally he the same singular and
undivided: deeply sick and ethically corrupted. This is said, because he
doesn’t feel ashamed of himself in changing himself into an actor of religious,
moral or social life with the further aim, through deception, of gathering the
fruits of sin or the glory withering as the grass of the field and which is
able to change into a wind of destruction and heavy obscurity. The hypocrite is undoubtedly an
unethical character. Jesus, from his part, castigated no one so much, as this
one. Robbers, deniers of the faith, whores, tax-collectors and the whole slew
of sinners found their justification before forgiving Jesus after repenting,
but the hypocrite, which the Pharisaical mafia embodied, never. Those
terrifying “woes”, which ploughed and will plough through the centuries the
consciences of every form and every type of hypocrites, will prove how
difficult it is for these subjects to repent and to enter the clean spiritual
sphere of Christ, subjects which with all their freedom, without irascibility,
far from being forced, formed their life to counterfeit, with their frequent
immoral asceticism, their character and to cheapen the image of God, only and
only so that they may exploit the psychological phenomenon of trust and the
common human sickness which is called physical weakness. In the dewy grass, the
poisonous snake. In the fattest bouquet of flowers, the knife. In the Sacred Temple ,
satan. Under the robe, the atheist; behold the hypocrite, who gets all shaken
up when the sign of the cross was not done when the church bell rang, while he
himself bears the seal of blasphemy and the denial of every moral principle. He
exploits religion, virtue, fatherland, family relations, friendship, and he is
most known as “Tartoufos” of Molliere.
The
hypocrite was always a danger for every social class, inexcusably for every honorable man. The
sentiments, which he raises up, are sentiments of sacred indignation. And that,
to be sure, the hypocrite can not hold up for long his role for geniuses and
moral people, this doesn’t mean that his psychical synthesis, or composition of
soul, changes. That, at least, is proved by the psychological analysis of those
gospel passages, which refer to the stripes of the hypocrites: that is taught
to us by experience. The hypocrite, as a fearful “kapilos” trader, is subject
to social excommunication. But how beneficial wouldn’t it be, and indeed
increasingly, if from the young age people would learn to follow the path of
the morally “clear sky”, the straightforward and bright confession of his
imperfections, the manner of effectively putting to use his spiritual capitals.
Of course, if hypocrisy, as a living lie, was
absent, trust, as a beautiful and heavenly principle, would become the most
powerful moral and social bond.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου